Ye Ji Park / 111053 / 11b3
Mr. Richard Menard
American Literature
September 22 2012
Reflective Essay: The Conversion of the Jews
Parents, when their
child reaches the age of four or five, suffer from those entire
"Why?" questions the child asks. "Why?" questions are
tolerant for a young child, but unacceptable when a questioner is old enough.
Oscar Freedman, a thirteen-years-old protagonist of The Conversion of the Jews (Philip Roth, 1959), is considered as an
irritable boy who keeps asking trifling questions about God – for example,
"... why couldn't He let a woman have a baby without having
intercourse?" or "How Rabbi Binder (his teacher) could call the Jews
"The Chosen People" if the Declaration of Independence claimed all
men to be created equal?", etc. People who Oscar expects to give him
answers to the questions – Rabbi, his mother, and other adults – all consider
his questions as profane and nit-picking; so instead of giving answers, they
"hit Ozzie (Oscar) across the face" or "flicked out at Ozzie's
cheek".
Oscar is, however, not
asking these questions to resist to the religious doctrines or screw over the
adults. Actually, he respects "his mother lit the candles" – rituals
on the Sabbath – by "pressing the phone to his breast" and making no
sound. The sole intention of Oscar asking questions is pure curiosity. However,
people disregards his curiosity, just as a firefighter asks the Rabbi
"What, is the kid nuts or something?". People do not understand why
Oscar cannot "accept" religious precepts. Instead of embracing of
social consensus recklessly, Oscar tries to understand things logically. Maybe
this is why his surname is "Freedman" – a "freed man", not
fettered by conformity to his community.
Reading The Conversion of the Jews, I reminded
of someone who resembled Oscar Freedman a lot. Colin Beavan, the author of No Impact Man (2010), is a New Yorker
who, over a year, lived in NYC, affecting the environment as least as possible.
From the very basic step – stop using disposable diapers or tissue – Beavan
practiced inconvenient, sophisticated acts, such as giving up reading newspaper
(a thick collection of dead trees), staying away from fast food and eating only
local food, not using transportations, elevators, and even electricity, etc.
When Beaven first started to carry on this plan, which he entitled "No
Impact Man Project", his co-workers, friends, family, virtually everybody,
dissuaded him, arguing that his acts would not stop the Earth from being
contaminated. The community's belief, in short, was to relish all the
conveniences modern society provides; there was no reason for Colin Beavan to
"question" about the harmful effects people are giving to the Earth.
To NYC residents, Beavan was an Oscar Freedman boy who nit-picked about their
uses of modern technology and did not conform to the general belief of staying
inattentive to the Earth.
Beavan’s "No Impact
Man Project", conclusively, was not a meaningless struggle; his book
called forth majority's attention, he was introduced as a noticeable
environmentalist by New York Times, and a lot of impressed readers make
attempts to practice the project, at least partially.
As a person who has
conformed to the community and enjoyed environmental-harming technologies
without any guilt for seventeen years, I highly value struggles of Oscar
Freedman and Colin Beavan. I did hear that excessive use of air conditioner
results in global warming; still I did not stop myself from setting the
temperature 19℃. I did hear that dozens of
trees were being logged to produce white, fresh papers; still I did not stop
myself from dumping one-sided paper without second use. It was too irritating
and bothering to question the impacts of my acts; the easiest way to live was
to passively accept the general paradigm and follow what others do. What Oscar
and Beavan tell me right now, however, is that such an irksome questioning can
bring out positive outcomes to society; Oscar offered his community opportunity
to reconsider about its indiscreet religious fervor, and Beavan helped his
community to recognize the decay of the Earth due to the community’s thoughtless
consumption of conveniences. Healthy skepticism of questioning a majority opinion
is what I and my community need right now – not rash recalcitrance but mere
curiosity, which would help the community to find out its fault and resolve,
thereby improve.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기